Catarman Barangay, Economy and Demographics Northern Samar
Catarman is a coastal municipality in the province of Northern Samar. It serves as the provincial capital.
The municipality of Catarman has a land area of 464.43 square kilometers and179.32 square miles which constitutes 12.57% total area. In addition, its population as determined by the 2020 Census was 97,879.
This represented 15.31% of the total population or 2.15% of the overall population of the Eastern Visayas region.
Municipality of Catarman
Catarman is officially the Municipality (Waray[Ninorte Samarnon]: Bungto san Catarman; Tagalog: Bayan ng Catarman), is a 1st class municipality and capital of the province of Northern Samar, Philippines.
According to the 2020 census, initially it has a population of 97,879 people. atarman Municipality initially is officially the Municipality of Catarman (Waray [Ninorte Samarnon]: Bungto san Catarman; Tagalog: Bayan ng Catarman), is a 1st class municipality and capital of the province of Northern Samar, Philippines. According to the 2020 census, it has a population of 97,879 people.[3] It is the commercial, educational, financial, and political center of the province and also its most populous municipality. Spaniards, Catarman (also known as Calatman or Cataruman) was a settlement by the mouth of the river of the same name in the region called Ibabao. The Spanish Conquistadors applied the term Ibabao to the northern part of Samar island when it established its civil government. The similarities in the vocabularies and pronunciation of the dialects of these areas traces them to a common root as a people.
Catarman is officially the Municipality (Waray[Ninorte Samarnon]: Bungto san Catarman; Tagalog: Bayan ng
Catarman Demographic profile of barangays
The Catarman demographic of barangay offers a compelling snapshot of its resident. It paints a detailed picture of its inhabitants.
| Barangay | Population percentage (2020) | Population (2020) | Population (2015) | Change (2015‑2020) | Annual Population Growth Rate (2015‑2020) |
| Acacia | 0.23% | 223 | 259 | -13.90% | -3.10% |
| Aguinaldo | 0.47% | 458 | 504 | -9.13% | -1.99% |
| Airport Village | 2.16% | 2,115 | 2,224 | -4.90% | -1.05% |
| Bangkerohan | 2.61% | 2,553 | 2,262 | 12.86% | 2.58% |
| Baybay | 6.54% | 6,400 | 6,055 | 5.70% | 1.17% |
| Bocsol | 0.65% | 641 | 620 | 3.39% | 0.70% |
| Cabayhan | 0.25% | 242 | 239 | 1.26% | 0.26% |
| Cag-abaca | 1.95% | 1,911 | 1,998 | -4.35% | -0.93% |
| Calachuchi | 1.57% | 1,539 | 1,797 | -14.36% | -3.21% |
| Cal-igang | 1.11% | 1,091 | 1,047 | 4.20% | 0.87% |
| Cawayan | 4.32% | 4,231 | 4,317 | -1.99% | -0.42% |
| Cervantes | 3.35% | 3,278 | 3,255 | 0.71% | 0.15% |
| Cularima | 0.30% | 294 | 344 | -14.53% | -3.25% |
| Daganas | 2.94% | 2,881 | 2,351 | 22.54% | 4.37% |
| Dalakit | 12.34% | 12,075 | 11,962 | 0.94% | 0.20% |
| Doña Pulqueria | 1.32% | 1,294 | 1,310 | -1.22% | -0.26% |
| Galutan | 1.92% | 1,881 | 1,797 | 4.67% | 0.97% |
| Gebalagnan | 0.43% | 423 | 323 | 30.96% | 5.84% |
| Gebulwangan | 0.73% | 716 | 699 | 2.43% | 0.51% |
| General Malvar | 0.66% | 645 | 919 | -29.82% | -7.18% |
| Guba | 0.52% | 513 | 423 | 21.28% | 4.14% |
| Hinatad | 1.27% | 1,240 | 1,217 | 1.89% | 0.39% |
| Imelda | 0.97% | 948 | 866 | 9.47% | 1.92% |
| Ipil-ipil | 2.44% | 2,389 | 2,225 | 7.37% | 1.51% |
| Jose Abad Santos | 2.29% | 2,241 | 2,221 | 0.90% | 0.19% |
| Jose P. Rizal | 0.50% | 493 | 451 | 9.31% | 1.89% |
| Kasoy | 1.47% | 1,437 | 1,074 | 33.80% | 6.32% |
| Lapu-lapu | 0.37% | 365 | 402 | -9.20% | -2.01% |
| Liberty | 0.63% | 619 | 801 | -22.72% | -5.28% |
| Libjo | 2.33% | 2,284 | 2,166 | 5.45% | 1.12% |
| Mabini | 1.30% | 1,273 | 1,232 | 3.33% | 0.69% |
| Mabolo | 0.49% | 483 | 381 | 26.77% | 5.12% |
| Macagtas | 4.36% | 4,269 | 3,087 | 38.29% | 7.06% |
| Mckinley | 2.67% | 2,612 | 2,443 | 6.92% | 1.42% |
| Molave | 1.75% | 1,709 | 1,811 | -5.63% | -1.21% |
| Narra | 3.22% | 3,149 | 3,190 | -1.29% | -0.27% |
| New Rizal | 1.27% | 1,245 | 1,241 | 0.32% | 0.07% |
| Old Rizal | 2.49% | 2,440 | 1,947 | 25.32% | 4.87% |
| Paticua | 1.28% | 1,255 | 1,319 | -4.85% | -1.04% |
| Polangi | 4.19% | 4,104 | 3,905 | 5.10% | 1.05% |
| Quezon | 0.78% | 767 | 762 | 0.66% | 0.14% |
| Salvacion | 0.53% | 514 | 411 | 25.06% | 4.82% |
| Sampaguita | 0.46% | 446 | 600 | -25.67% | -6.05% |
| San Julian | 0.40% | 396 | 313 | 26.52% | 5.08% |
| San Pascual | 0.41% | 406 | 403 | 0.74% | 0.16% |
| Santol | 0.39% | 377 | 404 | -6.68% | -1.45% |
| Somoge | 1.46% | 1,427 | 1,402 | 1.78% | 0.37% |
| Talisay | 1.63% | 1,599 | 1,522 | 5.06% | 1.04% |
| Tinowaran | 0.57% | 560 | 554 | 1.08% | 0.23% |
| Trangue | 0.60% | 589 | 609 | -3.28% | -0.70% |
| UEP I | 1.73% | 1,692 | 1,653 | 2.36% | 0.49% |
| UEP II | 1.34% | 1,316 | 1,412 | -6.80% | -1.47% |
| UEP III | 3.19% | 3,118 | 2,717 | 14.76% | 2.94% |
| Washington | 2.09% | 2,049 | 1,872 | 9.46% | 1.92% |
| Yakal | 2.72% | 2,664 | 2,719 | -2.02% | -0.43% |
| Catarman Total | 97,879 | 94,037 | 4.09% | 0.85% | |
Economy
After all the annual regular revenue of Catarman for the fiscal year of 2016 was ₱261,995,840.02.
Detail:
| Fiscal Year | Annual Regular Income | Change |
| 2009 | 142,200,712.74 | – |
| 2010 | 149,985,778.84 | 5.47% |
| 2011 | 167,744,472.50 | 11.84% |
| 2012 | 166,943,113.84 | -0.48% |
| 2013 | 183,269,391.81 | 9.78% |
| 2014 | 210,968,453.53 | 15.11% |
| 2015 | 241,501,140.00 | 14.47% |
| 2016 | 261,995,840.02 | 8.49% |
| End notes: Annual Regular Income = Locally Sourced Revenue + Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) Current Year + Other Shares from National Tax CollectionLocally Sourced Revenue = Real Property Tax (General Fund) + Tax on Business + Other Taxes + Regulatory Fees + Service/User Charges + Receipts from Economic Enterprises | ||
Catarman Demographics
Moreover, Catarman demographics situated by the coast, Catarman boasts a rich aspects of demographics. Beginning with its youthful influx, drawn by the allure of seaside living, the community unfolds a narrative of cultural diversity.
Households
The household population in the 2015 Census was 93,627 broken down into an average of 4.90 members per household.
Details:
| Census date | Household population | Number of households | Average household size |
| 1990 May 1 | 50,906 | 9,228 | 5.52 |
| 1995 Sep 1 | 61,299 | 11,177 | 5.48 |
| 2000 May 1 | 67,527 | 12,437 | 5.43 |
| 2007 Aug 1 | 80,924 | 15,269 | 5.30 |
| 2010 May 1 | 84,280 | 16,226 | 5.19 |
| 2015 Aug 1 | 93,627 | 19,091 | 4.90 |
Population by age group
According to the 2015 Census, the age group with the highest population is 15 to 19, with 11,849 individuals. To sum up, the age group with the lowest population is 80 and over, with 566 individuals.
details
Aged 14 and below, consisting young dependent population include infants/babies, children and young adolescents, make up an aggregate of 36.25%.
Aged 15 up to 64 potential members of the work, constitute a total of 59.71%. So that Old dependent population consisting of the senior citizens, those aged 65 and over total 4.04%.
Age Dependency Ratios are 61 youth dependents; and 7 aged; to sum up, 67 dependents every 100 of working population.
| Age group | Population (2015) | Age group percentage |
| Under 1 | 2,123 | 2.26% |
| 1 to 4 | 9,034 | 9.61% |
| 5 to 9 | 11,112 | 11.82% |
| 10 to 14 | 11,822 | 12.57% |
| 15 to 19 | 11,849 | 12.60% |
| 20 to 24 | 9,158 | 9.74% |
| 25 to 29 | 6,484 | 6.90% |
| 30 to 34 | 5,484 | 5.83% |
| 35 to 39 | 5,419 | 5.76% |
| 40 to 44 | 4,956 | 5.27% |
| 45 to 49 | 4,232 | 4.50% |
| 50 to 54 | 3,555 | 3.78% |
| 55 to 59 | 2,889 | 3.07% |
| 60 to 64 | 2,119 | 2.25% |
| 65 to 69 | 1,412 | 1.50% |
| 70 to 74 | 1,159 | 1.23% |
| 75 to 79 | 664 | 0.71% |
| 80 and over | 566 | 0.60% |
| Total | 94,037 | 100.00% |
| Youth Dependency Ratio: 60.72Old Age Dependency Ratio: 6.77Total Dependency Ratio: 67.49Median Age: 20.59 | ||
Historical population
Somehow the population grew from 9,994 in 1903 to 97,879 in 2020, To sum up, an increase of 87,885 people.
| Census date | Population | Growth rate |
| 1903 Mar 2 | 9,994 | – |
| 1918 Dec 31 | 13,278 | 1.81% |
| 1939 Jan 1 | 21,007 | 2.32% |
| 1948 Oct 1 | 33,153 | 4.79% |
| 1960 Feb 15 | 39,434 | 1.54% |
| 1970 May 6 | 44,438 | 1.18% |
| 1975 May 1 | 53,267 | 3.70% |
| 1980 May 1 | 59,021 | 2.07% |
| 1990 May 1 | 50,965 | -1.46% |
| 1995 Sep 1 | 61,705 | 3.65% |
| 2000 May 1 | 67,671 | 2.00% |
| 2007 Aug 1 | 81,067 | 2.52% |
| 2010 May 1 | 84,833 | 1.67% |
| 2015 Aug 1 | 94,037 | 1.98% |
| 2020 May 1 | 97,879 | 0.85% |
PopulationGrowth Rate
As a result, from infancy, the population growth rate illustrates dynamic trajectory. Initially, it steadily rises, driven by factors such as birth rates and immigration. Subsequently, the growth rate undergoes a transitional phase, moderating into a more balanced state. Ultimately, understanding these shift is a crucial for planning future societal needs and environmental sustainability.
Demographic Profile
https://www.philatlas.com/visayas/r08/northern-samar/catarman.html
Leave a Reply